Betty Broderick: Astonishing Double Homicide

Today’s post is about a double homicide that Betty Broderick committed in 1989.

Consider this scenario. A young woman works to put her husband through first medical school, then law school. Along the way, she gives birth to five children. Then, when he has established himself as a prominent attorney with a lucrative practice, he dumps his wife of sixteen years to marry his much younger legal assistant.

That is precisely the situation Betty Broderick found herself in in the spring of 1989. Tension and stress mounted through the summer and fall, until November, when Betty snapped and shot both her ex-husband and his new wife to death.

This is what happened.

Betty Broderick

Betty Broderick was born Elizabeth Anne Bisceglia in Brooklyn, New York, on November 7, 1947. She and Dan (born Daniel T. Broderick III) met at a dance at Notre Dame University, where he was a senior, while she was a student at the nearby College of St. Mary’s. Dan’s pursuit of Betty was relentless, bordering on obsession. Today, we would call it “love bombing.” Regardless, they married on April 12, 1969. Betty returned from their honeymoon pregnant with their first child, Kim.

Betty and Dan Broderick at their April 1969 wedding (Morbid Podcast Facebook)
Betty and Dan Broderick at their April 1969 wedding (Morbid Podcast Facebook)

Shortly after their daughter was born, Dan completed his medical degree at Cornell and enrolled in Harvard Law School. He graduated with his J.D. in 1973. Betty was the family’s main support while Dan was a student.

Once he graduated from law school, Dan moved the family to San Diego, California, to work for that city’s largest law firm. Five years later, he left to start his own firm, specializing in medical malpractice.

Betty Broderick is Dumped

The Broderick marriage deteriorated in the early 1980s. In the autumn of 1982, Dan hired Linda Kolkena, a former Delta Air Lines flight attendant, as his legal assistant. Although he initially denied it, Betty began to suspect that Dan and Linda were having an affair. After moving out of their house in February 1985, Dan eventually confessed that he and Linda had, in fact, been intimate. Dan filed for divorce later that year, beginning what became a contentious four-year court battle.

By this time, Dan owned a successful law firm and was president of the San Diego Bar Association. His prominence in the legal community made it difficult for Betty to find anyone to represent her in the divorce action. As the divorce case reached its endgame, Dan received sole custody of his and Betty’s children and sold their house against Betty’s wishes. Betty, naturally, believed he had used his influence in the legal community to achieve these results, as well as to deprive her of a rightful share of his income.

Betty Broderick Snaps

Being replaced by a younger woman broke Betty. While the divorce case dragged on in court, she started to exhibit erratic behavior. She left countless messages using sulphurous language on Dan’s answering machine, ignored restraining orders, and vandalized Dan’s home. Linda was so concerned that she urged Dan to wear a bulletproof vest at their wedding on April 22, 1989. He declined, but did arrange for security guards to patrol the venue. Betty did not attend.

Linda Kolkena and Dan Broderick in an undated photo (Oxygen/YouTube)
Linda Kolkena and Dan Broderick in an undated photo (Oxygen/YouTube)

On November 5, 1989, seven months after Dan and Linda’s wedding, Betty took a gun she had purchased six months earlier and drove to their house. Using a key she had taken from her daughter, Kim, Betty slipped into the house at 5:30 a.m. While the couple slept, she opened fire.

Two bullets struck Linda in the chest and head; she died instantly. One bullet hit Dan in the chest as he appeared to be reaching for the phone. Unknown to him, the phone was not there. Evidence introduced during her trial showed that Betty had removed the combination phone and answering machine to prevent anyone from calling for help.

This five-shot Smith & Wesson .38 caliber revolver was the weapon used to kill Dan and Linda Broderick (Michael Franklin/U-T San Diego/ZUMAPRESS.com)
This five-shot Smith & Wesson .38 caliber revolver was the weapon used to kill Dan and Linda Broderick (Michael Franklin/U-T San Diego/ZUMAPRESS.com)

After calling her daughter, Lee, and Lee’s boyfriend, Betty surrendered herself to the police. She never denied pulling the trigger, but insisted she never planned to kill the couple. Instead, she claimed she only wanted “to talk,” and that Linda screaming, “Call the police!” startled her, causing the gun to go off. However, it is worth noting that the gun “went off” five times, emptying the five-shot Smith & Wesson revolver.

Betty Broderick on Trial

Betty Broderick went on trial on October 22, 1990. Not surprisingly, the prosecution and defense painted two completely opposing versions of what happened on that November morning. Betty’s attorney, Jack Early, claimed that Betty was a battered wife, driven by years of physical, psychological, and mental abuse by her ex-husband. Prosecutor Kerry Wells, however, insisted that Betty was not a battered woman and that she had planned and schemed to kill Dan and Linda.

Betty Broderick in court (Howard Lipin/U-T San Diego/ZUMAPRESS.com)
Betty Broderick in court (Howard Lipin/U-T San Diego/ZUMAPRESS.com)

The trial ended in a hung jury. Two jurors held out for manslaughter, believing Betty had formed no intent to kill Dan and Linda. This forced Judge Thomas J. Whelan to declare a mistrial.

Since the prosecuting and defense attorneys were the same, it was no surprise that Betty’s second trial was mostly a rerun of the first. This time, however, prosecutor Wells secured a conviction on two counts of second-degree murder. Judge Whelan sentenced Betty to two terms of fifteen years to life to be served consecutively. He also sentenced her to two additional years for the illegal use of a firearm.

Epilogue

Betty Broderick has been in custody since the day of the murders and currently (2026) resides at the California Institution for Women in Chino. Denied parole in 2010 and 2017, her next parole hearing will be in January 2032, when she will be 84.

Betty Broderick in an undated prison mugshot (thecinemaholic.com)
Betty Broderick in an undated prison mugshot (thecinemaholic.com)

Numerous books cover the Betty Broderick case. For further reading, consider Forsaking All Others by Loretta Schwartz Nobel, Until the Twelfth of Never by Bella Stumbo, Betty Broderick, the Mother, the Murderer by Charles Dennis, or Bryna Taubman’s Hell Hath No Fury.

Don’t Miss Out! Subscribe to the Newsletter

Subscribe to True Crime in the News, a monthly email newsletter that examines recent news stories of interest to true crime enthusiasts. The newsletter also summarizes the blog posts from the previous month. You won’t want to miss this. Join the newsletter mailing list today.

Dan Serafini: Former Baseball Player Commits Unusual Murder

This week’s blog post explores a relatively recent crime. In 2001, an intruder shot and killed Robert Spohr in his Lake Tahoe, California, home. Four years later, a jury convicted Spohr’s son-in-law, former Major League Baseball pitcher Dan Serafini, of murder.

The Early Life and MLB Career of Dan Serafini

Daniel Joseph “Dan” Serafini was born on January 25, 1974, in San Francisco, California. A left-handed pitcher, he emerged as a top prospect during his teenage years and was selected in the first round of the 1992 Major League Baseball draft by the Minnesota Twins. Known for his smooth delivery and breaking ball, Serafini made his major-league debut with the Twins in 1996.

Dan Serafini as a Minnesota Twin (Brian Bahr/Allsport)
Dan Serafini as a Minnesota Twin (Brian Bahr/Allsport)

Over the next decade, Serafini bounced around the league, playing for several teams and shuttling between the major and minor leagues. After his early seasons in Minnesota, Serafini went on to pitch for the Chicago Cubs, San Diego Padres, Pittsburgh Pirates, Cincinnati Reds, and Colorado Rockies. He also spent time pitching professionally in overseas leagues. When he made his last MLB appearance with the Rockies in 2007, he owned a record of 15 wins and 16 losses over 263 innings, with an earned run average of 6.04.

Serafini’s name surfaced in connection with Major League Baseball’s drug-testing program in 2007. MLB suspended him for testing positive for performance-enhancing substances. Shortly after that suspension, he retired from professional baseball and later transitioned into business ventures, including ownership of a bar and a baseball training academy in Nevada.

The 2021 Shooting in Lake Tahoe

On June 5, 2021, an armed intruder shot Robert Gary Spohr, 70, and his wife, Wendy Wood, 68, in their Lake Tahoe, California, home. Their daughter, Erin Spohr, was Dan Serafini’s wife. Spohr died instantly; Wood suffered two gunshots to the head but survived, although critically injured.

Robert Spohr and Wendy Wood (Placer County Sheriff)
Robert Spohr and Wendy Wood (Placer County Sheriff)

The case dragged on for more than two years. Home security video partially captured the masked intruder, and the investigation focused on identifying both him and a possible motive. Detectives examined personal, financial, and familial links between the victims and their relatives. Wendy Wood tried to rebuild her life during this time. However, she died by suicide in 2023, which her family later blamed on the lingering effects of the shooting.

Dan Serafini Arrested

In October 2023, authorities arrested Dan Serafini in Nevada in connection with the Lake Tahoe attack. Investigators also detained Samantha Scott, a former family nanny and close friend of the Serafini family. Both Serafini and Scott were extradited to California. Prosecutors charged Serafini with first-degree murder, attempted murder, and burglary, with special-circumstance allegations that included lying in wait and use of a firearm.

Dan Serafini in his mugshot after his arrest (Humboldt County)
Dan Serafini in his mugshot after his arrest (Humboldt County)

The case drew attention not only because of Serafini’s status as a former professional athlete but also due to its family dynamics. Prosecutors alleged that Serafini had a clear financial motive: an ongoing dispute over a loan and business dealings involving a ranch property owned by the Spohr family. Court filings detailed an alleged $1.3 million loan that had become a source of tension. Investigators described a deteriorating relationship marked by anger and resentment over money, control, and family property.

Prosecutors produced evidence that included surveillance video showing a figure approaching the victims’ home in the hours before the attack. They also introduced text messages, emails, and witness statements indicating that Serafini had spoken about harming or retaliating against his in-laws. According to the prosecution, these communications demonstrated premeditation and intent.

The Role of Samantha Scott

Samantha Scott, who once worked for the Serafini family, was accused of helping plan the crime and concealing information about the shooting. Prosecutors asserted that she had traveled with Serafini near the time of the incident and helped arrange logistics connected to the attack. As the case advanced, Scott reached a plea agreement with the state. She admitted to acting as an accessory after the fact in exchange for a reduced sentence and agreed to testify about her knowledge of events surrounding the murder.

Samantha Scott in court (Placer County Sheriff's Office)
Samantha Scott in court (Placer County Sheriff’s Office)

Her testimony became a significant component of the state’s case. Prosecutors used her account to reinforce the theory that Serafini was directly involved in organizing and carrying out the assault, arguing that she had firsthand knowledge of his movements and communications. The defense challenged her credibility, noting inconsistencies in her recollections and emphasizing that she faced her own criminal exposure.

Dan Serafini on Trial

Dan Serafini went on trial in Placer County in early 2025. Proceedings lasted several weeks, with testimony from law enforcement officers, forensic specialists, digital-evidence experts, and members of the victims’ family. The prosecution presented its case as one of careful preparation and deliberate execution. They contended that Serafini entered the home with a clear plan to kill his father-in-law and attempted to kill his mother-in-law, motivated by anger and financial strain.

Prosecutors played hours of surveillance video recorded in the neighborhood, showing a person wearing a hooded jacket and mask arriving at and leaving the property around the time of the shooting. While the figure’s face was not visible, investigators argued that the clothing, movements, and timing matched Serafini’s actions that day. They also cited cell-phone location data, travel records, and vehicle tracking information to establish a connection between Serafini and the scene.

The defense countered that the state lacked direct physical evidence linking Serafini to the crime. No DNA, fingerprints, or weapon were conclusively tied to him. The defense emphasized discrepancies in witness descriptions and questioned whether the individual in the footage matched Serafini’s height and build. Attorneys argued that, although he had expressed frustration with his in-laws, there was no proof that he committed or ordered the shooting.

Dan Serafini (L) with is lawyers in court (Sacramento Bee)
Dan Serafini (L) with is lawyers in court (Sacramento Bee)

The prosecution’s closing arguments described the crime as a calculated ambush carried out by someone familiar with the home and its security system. They pointed to the use of a silenced weapon and the absence of forced entry as indicators that the assailant had inside knowledge of the property. The defense insisted that the prosecution’s case was circumstantial and relied heavily on interpretation rather than proof.

Dan Serafini Convicted and Sentenced

After three days of deliberation, the jury returned guilty verdicts on all major counts in July 2025. Serafini was found guilty of first-degree murder for the death of Gary Spohr, attempted murder for the shooting of Wendy Wood, and first-degree burglary. The jury also upheld the special-circumstance allegations, including lying in wait and firearm use, which exposed him to a sentence of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole.

The Lake Tahoe home of Robert Spohr and Wendy Wood (Pedro Colo for DailyMail.com)
The Lake Tahoe home of Robert Spohr and Wendy Wood (Pedro Colo for DailyMail.com)

Following the verdict, members of the victims’ family addressed the court, describing years of grief and loss. Jurors later remarked that the combination of digital evidence, testimony, and the financial-motive narrative had convinced them beyond a reasonable doubt. A sentencing hearing was scheduled for August 2025, where Serafini is expected to receive a term of life in prison.

Epilogue

The court postponed Dan Serafini’s sentencing until October 28, 2025. At that time, it will take up his lawyers’ motion for a new trial as well as sentencing.

Samantha Scott also awaits sentencing (2025) after her guilty plea. With good behavior and the time she has already spent in custody, it is unlikely she will face a lengthy sentence.

Erin Spohr filed for divorce on July 21, 2025, about a week after Serafini’s conviction.

Don’t Miss Out! Subscribe to the Newsletter

Subscribe to True Crime in the News, a monthly email newsletter that examines recent news stories of interest to true crime enthusiasts. The newsletter also summarizes the blog posts from the previous month. You won’t want to miss this. Join the newsletter mailing list today.

Denise Williams: Wife Guilty in Devastating Death of Man

It is a truism that when it comes to homicide, the perpetrator is often close to the victim. It is so often the case that detectives usually start looking for a killer “from the inside out.” This blog post is about one such case, that of Denise Williams, who was convicted of conspiring to murder her husband, Mike, for a large insurance payout.

Mike and Denise Williams

Michael “Mike” Williams was a 31-year-old real estate appraiser and a typical family man. He and his wife, Denise Williams, had been married for six years and lived in Tallahassee, Florida, with their young daughter, Anslee. As far as anyone knew, they were a devoted couple who delighted in their 18-month-old child.

Photo from Mike and Denise Williams' wedding (Washington Post)
Photo from Mike and Denise Williams’ wedding (Washington Post)

On the cold morning of December 16, 2000, Mike set out on a routine duck‑hunting trip on Lake Seminole. Before launching his boat into the murky lake waters, he promised to be home by noon. He and Denise planned to celebrate their wedding anniversary that evening. But Mike never came home.

When Mike failed to return, his wife promptly alerted authorities. A large-scale search followed, spanning land, water, and air. It lasted for more than a month. Rescue teams found his boat adrift, his decoys and shotgun still inside, but there was no trace of Mike himself. After 44 days with no sign of his body, authorities declared him missing. Six months later, officials recovered waders, a jacket, a hunting license, and even a functioning flashlight. Authorities issued a death certificate citing an accidental drowning. Eerie rumors spread that an alligator may have eaten him.

Mike’s Mother Has Her Doubts

Local investigators leaned toward an accidental death, but Mike’s mother, Cheryl Williams, remained skeptical. She refused to accept the alligator hypothesis or accidental drowning, as such attacks are exceedingly rare, especially during the chilly winter months. Driven by her conviction, Cheryl painstakingly compiled 27 pages of observations and unanswered questions. Her dogged determination took the form of daily letters to Florida’s governor (over 1,400 in total), billboards, picket signs, and a steadfast refusal to allow the case to slip into obscurity.

Denise Merrill (later Williams), Mike Williams, and Bian Wichester as they appeared in the North Florida Christian School yearbook in 1988  (Tallahassee Democrat)
Denise Merrill (later Williams), Mike Williams, and Bian Wichester as they appeared in the North Florida Christian School yearbook in 1988 (Tallahassee Democrat)

Her advocacy paid off. Four years after the disappearance, the Florida Department of Law Enforcement initiated a full review. There was no physical evidence, no body, no witnesses, and no weapon. However, the inconsistencies Cheryl noted led authorities to turn their attention toward the few individuals who stood to benefit from Mike’s presumed death.

A Suspicious Relationship for Denise Williams

The investigation took an unexpected turn when records showed that Mike had taken out three separate life insurance policies worth approximately $1.75 million (over $3.25 million in 2025). Particularly questionable was a $1 million policy written only months before Mike’s disappearance. This policy, it turned out, had been sold by Mike’s best friend, Brian Winchester. Further thickening the plot, Brian had begun a romantic relationship with Mike’s young widow, Denise, months before Mike vanished. The couple married in 2005. These revelations raised suspicions and framed Mike’s disappearance not as an accident but potentially as a calculated homicide motivated by financial and emotional gain.

The Williams Conspiracy Unravels

For years after Mike Williams’ disappearance, law enforcement could not confront Brian or Denise directly. As long as the couple remained married, neither could be compelled to testify against the other. However, in 2016, Brian attempted to kidnap Denise at gunpoint, shifting the dynamics. Though Denise outwardly maintained her innocence, Brian’s confession in custody provided the turning point.

Mugshots of Brian Winchester and Denise Williams (Leon County Sheriff's Office)
Mugshots of Brian Winchester and Denise Williams (Leon County Sheriff’s Office)

In exchange for immunity from murder charges, Brian admitted his role in Mike’s death. He revealed that on that December morning, he and Mike had gone out on the lake under the pretense of hunting. Brian intentionally shoved Mike into the water, expecting him to drown under the weight of his gear. When Mike fought to survive, Brian shot him in the face with a shotgun. He then loaded his wounded friend’s body onto his boat and transported him miles away, where he hurriedly buried him. He joined the search party later that day. Brian confessed that Denise had been involved. She needed Mike out of the way to collect the life insurance and make way for her relationship with Brian.

Denise Williams Arrested

In 2018, nearly two decades after the murder, prosecutors arrested Denise Williams on charges of first-degree murder, conspiracy to commit murder, and accessory after the fact. Her case went to trial in late 2018. The prosecution’s core evidence rested on Brian’s detailed confession and Denise’s alleged motives of greed and illicit romance. Denise pleaded not guilty, vehemently denying prior knowledge or involvement.

During the trial, Brian recounted each step: the deceitful boat ride, the struggle on the water’s edge, and the execution-style killing. He described the ensuing plan to stage an accident, planting Mike’s gear to support the drowning theory. Denise reportedly issued no protest, even as Bryan detailed the crime against the man who was her husband.

Brian Winchester testifies in court (Alicia Devine/Tallahassee Democrat via AP, Pool)
Brian Winchester testifies in court (Alicia Devine/Tallahassee Democrat via AP, Pool)

After deliberating for eight hours, the jury found Denise guilty on all charges. They convicted her of conspiracy to commit murder, first-degree murder, and accessory after the fact. In February 2019, she received a life sentence in prison.

Denise Williams Appeals

Denise’s defense team fought back legally. In November 2020, a Florida appellate court ruled that while there was sufficient proof of Denise’s intent to conspire, the prosecution had not established that she actively aided in the commission of murder. The court vacated her first-degree murder conviction but maintained the conspiracy conviction, reducing her sentence to a 30-year prison term.

Denise Williams prison mugshot (Florida Department of Corrections)
Denise Williams prison mugshot (Florida Department of Corrections)

Though the state’s Supreme Court declined to review the case, the appellate ruling underscored the legal nuance between planning a crime and physically carrying it out.

Epilogue

Denise raised Anslee Williams until her imprisonment. Anslee was then raised by Mike’s mother, Cheryl. Today, Anslee is a college graduate who lives and works in Tallahassee.

Today, Denise Williams remains incarcerated at the Florida Women’s Reception Center. Her scheduled release date is March 31, 2046.

You can read more about the Mike Williams murder in Evil at Lake Seminole by Steven B. Epstein and Guilty Creatures by Mikita Brottman.

Don’t Miss Out! Subscribe to the Newsletter

Subscribe to True Crime in the News, a monthly email newsletter that examines recent news stories of interest to true crime enthusiasts. The newsletter also summarizes the previous month’s blog posts. You won’t want to miss this. Join the newsletter mailing list today.

Darlie Routier: Mom Found Guilty of Astonishing Murder

Crimes involving the deaths of children are gut-wrenching enough, but when the murderer is the children’s mother, things become downright horrifying. This week’s post is about a crime of this nature. In 1997, a jury convicted Darlie Routier of fatally stabbing her two sons in their Rowlett, Texas, home.

Darlie Routier Reports a Crime

Rowlett is a usually quiet suburban bedroom community located northeast of Dallas. However, that changed on the morning of June 6, 1996. In the early hours of that day, Darlie Routier, then 26, placed a 911 call from her home. She told dispatchers that an intruder had broken into the house and attacked her and her sons. Officers from the Rowlett Police Department responded and found 6-year-old Devon and 5-year-old Damon with fatal stab wounds. Damon appeared to be still alive when paramedics arrived but succumbed to his injuries shortly thereafter. Routier herself had suffered a cut to her throat and superficial injuries to her arms.

Darlie Routier with her three young sons in happier days. The youngest, Drake, was with his father upstairs and was not harmed (Dallas Morning News)
Darlie Routier with her three young sons in happier days. The youngest, Drake, was with his father upstairs and was not harmed (Dallas Morning News)

Initially, authorities followed standard procedure in a suspected home invasion. They cordoned off the house and began collecting evidence. However, investigators soon noted inconsistencies in Routier’s statements and discrepancies with the forensic evidence at the scene. Some of the questions involved the timeline of events, the location of bloodstains, and the apparent lack of forced entry.

Darlie Routier Becomes a Suspect

One of the pivotal moments in the case occurred when investigators reviewed footage of a birthday party held at the Routier home just eight days after the boys’ deaths. The gathering, which included balloons, a “Happy Birthday” banner, and Routier spraying Silly String near her sons’ graves, drew public criticism. Later at trial, prosecutors cited the videotaped celebration as evidence of a lack of remorse. Routier’s supporters, however, argued that the state took the footage out of context. They noted that it followed a more solemn memorial earlier that day.

Detectives increasingly focused their suspicions on Routier as the investigation progressed. In June 1996, police arrested her and charged her with the capital murder of Damon. Although prosecutors only charged her with one murder, they later said they believed she was responsible for both deaths. The state chose to pursue charges for only one of the murders. This strategy allowed them to seek the death penalty without the risk of additional acquittals.

Authorities lead Darlie Routier off to prison (Altoona Mirror)
Authorities lead Darlie Routier off to prison (Altoona Mirror)

Darlie Routier Tried and Convicted

A change of venue moved the 1997 trial to Kerrville, an hour northwest of San Antonio, due to extensive pretrial publicity in Dallas County. Prosecutors argued that Routier had staged the attack and self-inflicted her wounds in an attempt to create the illusion of a break-in. They presented forensic evidence, including blood spatter analysis and fiber evidence, suggesting that someone had manipulated the crime scene. Testimony indicated that a bread knife from the Routier kitchen had fiberglass fragments matching a cut window screen, which contradicted her claim of an intruder breaking in through a garage window.

The defense argued that the state built its case on circumstantial evidence and flawed forensic analysis. They pointed to the lack of a clear motive and emphasized Routier’s injuries, which they claimed were inconsistent with her inflicting them herself. Testimony from family members described Routier as a devoted mother who had been struggling with postpartum depression following the birth of her third child. (Note: The prosecution does not have to prove motive, or even suggest one, to get a murder conviction, but it helps.)

After several weeks of testimony, the jury deliberated for less than ten hours before finding Routier guilty of capital murder. She was sentenced to death and has remained on Texas’s death row for women ever since. Routier continues to maintain her innocence, and her case has been the subject of ongoing legal appeals, as well as periodic public interest.

Efforts to Get Darlie Routier a New Trial

In the years following her conviction, Routier’s defense team has sought to introduce new evidence, including updated DNA testing, in efforts to secure a new trial. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has allowed for some post-conviction testing, though none of the tests have been conclusive. While technological advances have transformed forensic science, revisiting a conviction from the 1990s remains a complex and lengthy process.

Darlie Routier in a still from "Ladies on Death Row" (The New Yorker)
Darlie Routier in a still from “Ladies on Death Row” (The New Yorker)

The Routier case continues to evoke strong reactions from both supporters and skeptics. For some, the conviction represents a just outcome based on a thorough investigation and due process. For others, lingering questions about the forensic evidence and the possibility of confirmation bias raise concerns about the reliability of the verdict.

Epilogue

At its core, the case is a tragic one: two young children lost in a violent attack, and a family irrevocably altered. As Darlie Routier remains on death row, legal efforts continue in the background, with motions, appeals, and forensic reviews ongoing. The case highlights some of the complexities of capital murder trials, particularly those that depend heavily on forensic interpretation and circumstantial evidence.

Darlie Routier remains one of seven women on Death Row at the Patrick O’Daniel Unit in Gatesville, Texas. The state has not set an execution date.

Darlie Routier in an undated prison photo (Texas Department of Criminal Justice via New Yorker)
Darlie Routier in an undated prison photo (Texas Department of Criminal Justice via New Yorker)

You can read more about the Darlie Routier case in Precious Angels: A True Story of Two Slain Children and a Mother Convicted of Murder by Barbara Davis. This book painted Routier as guilty and details the prosecution’s case. Davis has reportedly revised her opinion over time, although she has not published a new edition of the book.

W.G. Davis has produced two books, Bloodstained Justice and Just After Midnight, both of which present the defense side of the case. So does A Texas Style Witch Hunt: Justice Denied, by David Pietras.

Kathy Cruz takes a more critical approach to the case in Dateline Purgatory.

Don’t Miss Out! Subscribe to the Newsletter

Subscribe to True Crime in the News, a monthly email newsletter that examines recent news stories of interest to true crime enthusiasts. The newsletter also summarizes the previous month’s blog posts. You won’t want to miss this. Join the newsletter mailing list today.