Zodiac Killer: An Old Case but Big Murder Mystery

It’s a mystery that has endured for more than half a century. The Zodiac Killer terrorized Northern California in the late 1960s with a series of unsolved slayings. While he was active, he mocked the police with taunting messages and bizarre ciphers and cryptograms that he sent to newspapers and radio stations. Zodiac claimed responsibility for a series of shootings and stabbings, probably grossly exaggerating the number of his victims. Decades of investigation and extensive publicity produced suspects, but never conclusively identified the killer.

The First Zodiac Murders

Historians generally agree that the first Zodiac killing occurred on December 20, 1968, near Vallejo, California. An unknown assailant shot high school students David Faraday, 17, and Betty Lou Jensen, 16, while they were parked on Lake Herman Road. Jensen’s body lay several yards from the vehicle, while Faraday’s was near the car. Both died from their wounds. At the time, authorities had no clear indication that the killings were part of a larger series.

Zodiac's first confirmed victims, Michael Faraday and Betty Lou Jensen (High school portraits)
Zodiac’s first confirmed victims, Michael Faraday and Betty Lou Jensen (High school portraits)

On July 4, 1969, the killer attacked another young couple in a parked car at Blue Rock Springs Park in Vallejo. Darlene Ferrin, 22, and Michael Mageau, 19, both suffered multiple gunshot wounds. Ferrin died, but Mageau survived despite grievous injuries. Shortly after the attack, a man called the Vallejo Police Department and claimed responsibility for the shooting. The caller also referred to the Lake Herman Road murders, linking the two crimes.

Zodiac Opens a Publicity Campaign

Later in July, newspapers in the San Francisco Bay Area received nearly identical letters from someone claiming to be the killer. Each letter included part of a 408-symbol cipher. The writer demanded that the papers print the messages on their front pages and threatened further violence if they didn’t. The letters concluded with a crosshair-like symbol as a signature. The symbol later became closely associated with the Zodiac name.

Police released this composite sketch based on eyewitness accounts (San Francisco Police Department)
Police released this composite sketch based on eyewitness accounts (San Francisco Police Department)

Within days, a Salinas, California, couple with no professional experience in cryptography, Donald and Bettye Harden, solved the cipher. The decoded message stated that the killer enjoyed murdering people and suggested that his victims would serve him in the afterlife. The message did not reveal the writer’s name.

In another letter received in early August 1969, the writer used the phrase, “This is the Zodiac speaking,” marking the first known use of the name that would define the case. The letters, and the symbols that accompanied them, became central to the investigation and to public awareness of the crimes.

The Zodiac Attacks Continue

On September 27, 1969, college students Bryan Hartnell and Cecelia Shepard were attacked at Lake Berryessa in Napa County. The assailant approached wearing a fearsome-looking hood with the Zodiac symbol on the chest. He tied the pair and stabbed them repeatedly. Hartnell survived, but Shepard died two days later. Before leaving, the attacker wrote dates of earlier crimes on the door of Hartnell’s Volkswagen Karmann Ghia and signed it with the Zodiac symbol.

Police based this spine-tingling sketch of Zodiac on Bryan Hartnell's account
Police based this spine-tingling sketch of Zodiac on Bryan Hartnell’s account

The next confirmed killing occurred on October 11, 1969. A man hailed a cab in the Union Square area of downtown San Francisco and instructed the driver, Paul Stine, to take him to Washington and Maple streets in Presidio Heights. The cab traveled one block further to Washington and Cherry, where the passenger shot Stine in the head, killing him. The killer then removed part of Stine’s shirt and left the scene. Several days later, a letter sent to the San Francisco Chronicle included a piece of the bloodstained fabric, providing strong evidence that the writer was connected to the murder.

Zodiac left this message on Bryan Hartnell's car (FBI)
Zodiac left this message on Bryan Hartnell’s car (FBI)

The Stine killing prompted an intensified police response, in part because officers had been close to the crime scene shortly after the shooting. The initial police radio description incorrectly identified the suspect as a Black male, and two officers later reported seeing a White man walking nearby. By the time police corrected the error, the individual had disappeared.

More Messages from the Killer

The Zodiac continued writing to newspapers and authorities. Some letters contained additional ciphers, threats, diagrams, references to police activity, and claims of other killings. The writer sometimes took credit for crimes that law enforcement agencies could not definitively connect to Zodiac. As a result, it has been difficult to pin down the total number of Zodiac victims.

Among the most closely studied messages was a 340-character cipher mailed to the San Francisco Chronicle in November 1969. It resisted solution for more than 50 years. In December 2020, an international team of codebreakers announced that it had solved the cipher. The message again taunted authorities and referred to the killer’s beliefs about death, but it did not disclose an identity.

Suspects in the Zodiac Case

The investigation generated a long list of suspects. One of the best-known was Arthur Leigh Allen, a Vallejo resident whom police questioned. Allen later became the focus of intense public speculation. Investigators examined his background and possessions, and some circumstantial details pointed to him. However, no conclusive physical evidence established Allen as the Zodiac Killer. He died of a heart attack in 1992 without being charged in the case.

Arthur Leigh Allen was a prime suspect in the Zodiac case, but was never charged (findagrave.com)

Investigators, authors, journalists, amateur researchers, and relatives of deceased men have proposed other suspects. Some claims have attracted national attention, particularly when someone announces that they believe they have identified the killer. Law enforcement agencies generally respond cautiously, noting that the case requires evidence that can withstand formal scrutiny.

The Zodiac case became notable not only for the killings but also for the offender’s manipulation of the media. By sending letters, issuing threats, and creating puzzles, the killer expanded the investigation beyond individual crime scenes and forced newspapers and police departments to respond publicly. The correspondence also challenged investigators, who had to determine which letters were authentic and which were copycats.

Epilogue

Nearly sixty years after his last confirmed murder, the Zodiac Killer remains unidentified. Like Jack the Ripper and the Black Dahlia slayer, his identity is likely to remain a mystery, one of the things that makes the case so enduring.

The Zodiac killings inspired numerous films that either depict fictionalized versions of the crimes and investigation or use elements of the case as plot devices. The latter includes the 1971 film Dirty Harry, starring Clint Eastwood.

You can read more about the Zodiac Killer in Zodiac and Zodiac Unmasked, both by Robert Graysmith. Michael Butterfield (The Zodiac Killer) and Simon Wetherby (The Zodiac Killer: Cold Case Briefs Book 1) also wrote about the case.

Don’t Miss Out! Subscribe to the Newsletter

Subscribe to True Crime in the News, a monthly email newsletter that examines recent news stories of interest to true crime enthusiasts. You won’t want to miss this. Join the newsletter mailing list today.

Media Spins Big Mystery from Auto Dealer’s Murder

W. Haynie Gourley, a prominent Nashville, Tennessee, businessman, left his Capitol Chevrolet dealership on the morning of May 24, 1968, for what he expected to be a short drive. Within minutes, the 72-year-old businessman was dead and his associate wounded. The murder case that unfolded dominated local headlines for months.

Capitol Chevrolet executives (L to R) Jimmy Allen, Charlie McCaffrey, Haynie Gourley, and Bill Powell pose the day before the grand opening for their new headquarters at 600 Murfreesboro Road (Nashville Public Library, Special Collections, Banner Newspaper Collection)

Gourley was the founder and president of Capitol Chevrolet, a dealership he had established in 1932 during the Great Depression. By 1968, the company had become one of Nashville’s leading automobile businesses and had recently moved into a large new facility on Murfreesboro Road. Gourley had many friends in business and civic circles and had headed automobile trade organizations.

The Fatal Car Ride

Accompanying Gourley that morning was William E. Powell, Capitol Chevrolet’s executive vice president and minority shareholder. Powell had worked at the dealership since 1965 and owned 25 percent of the company stock. In the days before the shooting, the Gourley family and Powell had been discussing the future of the business. Gourley wanted his son, William Haynie “Billy” Gourley Jr., eventually to take control, and Powell had discussed selling his interest and leaving Capitol Chevrolet altogether.

At approximately 11 a.m., Gourley and Powell left the dealership for a brief drive to “discuss business.” Their route took them along Elm Hill Pike. What happened during that trip became the central question in one of Nashville’s most closely watched criminal investigations.

W. Haynie Gourley (standing) at Capitol Chevrolet’s offices at 510 Broadway, ca 1940s. Seated is business partner Charlie Rolfe (Billy Gourley via Martha Smith Tate)

Powell told police that near Spence Lane, an African American man entered the back seat of the automobile, displayed a gun, and demanded money. According to Powell, the assailant opened fire when Gourley reached for his wallet. Three bullets struck Gourley, killing him, while Powell suffered a gunshot wound to his leg. Powell then drove Gourley back to the dealership before calling police and an ambulance.

The Investigation Begins

The timing was unfortunate. Only weeks earlier, an assassin had murdered Martin Luther King Jr. in Memphis. Nashville had experienced subsequent racial tension, culminating in several National Guard deployments. Haynie Gourley’s murder, stoked by intensive press coverage, put the city on edge.

The case received extraordinary press attention. The Nashville Banner issued an extra edition on May 24, its first since the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in 1963. Rewards offered by the City of Belle Meade and the Nashville Automobile Trade Association eventually totaled $12,000 (over $113,000 in 2026).

The Nashville Banner extra edition announcing Gourley’s murder (Nashville Banner)

Investigators quickly began searching for the gunman Powell had described. Authorities questioned numerous Black men while police searched the Elm Hill Pike area for evidence. Yet despite the publicity and the rewards, the initial Metro police investigation produced no viable suspects. One man questioned soon after the killing had an alibi. Another man whom Powell later said resembled the assailant proved to have been in California on the day Gourley died. Investigators also examined physical evidence from the automobile and searched extensively for the weapon.

As the investigation continued, authorities began focusing on Powell himself. Gourley’s wallet had not been taken, and detectives scrutinized both the physical evidence and the men’s business relationship. In March 1969, a Davidson County grand jury indicted Powell on a charge of first-degree murder.

William Powell on Trial

The resulting trial became a major event in Nashville. Judge Allen Cornelius presided. District Attorney General Thomas Shriver prosecuted the case with attorney John J. Hooker Sr. serving as special prosecutor. Cecil Branstetter and Jack Norman Sr., two of the city’s best-known lawyers, represented Powell.

The prosecution’s case was largely circumstantial. The state presented testimony concerning the business arrangements at Capitol Chevrolet and called a witness who said he had seen a black automobile containing only two men shortly before hearing gunshots. The defense challenged that witness’s recollection and introduced testimony questioning whether he had been at the location he described.

This gun was found on Elm Hill Pike about three months after the murder. The man who found it did not turn it in until the last week of the trial because he “didn’t want to get involved.” (Martha Smith Tate)

Another dramatic development involved a rusted .38-caliber Smith & Wesson pistol found along Elm Hill Pike months after the killing. Because of its condition, investigators could not conclusively establish that it had fired the bullets that killed Gourley. The judge did not permit the pistol itself to be introduced after the prosecution had rested its case, although he did allow additional testimony concerning the weapon. A former Capitol Chevrolet employee testified that he had once supplied Powell with a similar handgun. Powell denied receiving or owning it.

Powell also testified in his own defense and maintained the account he had given from the beginning: that a third man had entered the automobile and opened fire. He denied killing Gourley.

On August 2, 1969, after nearly five hours of deliberation, the jury returned a verdict of not guilty.

Epilogue

The acquittal ended the prosecution of William Powell, but it did not solve the murder. No other person was convicted of killing W. Haynie Gourley. Decades later, the Metropolitan Government Archives still preserve about 2,400 pages of trial records and dozens of photographs from the proceedings. The documented facts end with a prominent businessman dead, the only surviving witness acquitted of his murder, and the identity of the killer unresolved.

Bill Powell gained control of Capitol Chevrolet and ran it for many years. Carl Black opened Carl Black Chevrolet on June 2, 2003, taking over the building at 600 Murfreesboro Road. In 2015, Metro Nashville demolished the Capitol Chevrolet site and built a new police headquarters building there.

You can read more about the murder of Haynie Gourley in Martha Smith Tate’s The Last Ride, the only book to date to examine the case in detail.

Don’t Miss Out! Subscribe to the Newsletter

Subscribe to True Crime in the News, a monthly email newsletter that examines recent news stories of interest to true crime enthusiasts. You won’t want to miss this. Join the newsletter mailing list today.

Betty Broderick: Astonishing Double Homicide

Today’s post is about a double homicide that Betty Broderick committed in 1989.

Consider this scenario. A young woman works to put her husband through first medical school, then law school. Along the way, she gives birth to five children. Then, when he has established himself as a prominent attorney with a lucrative practice, he dumps his wife of sixteen years to marry his much younger legal assistant.

That is precisely the situation Betty Broderick found herself in in the spring of 1989. Tension and stress mounted through the summer and fall, until November, when Betty snapped and shot both her ex-husband and his new wife to death.

This is what happened.

Betty Broderick

Betty Broderick was born Elizabeth Anne Bisceglia in Brooklyn, New York, on November 7, 1947. She and Dan (born Daniel T. Broderick III) met at a dance at Notre Dame University, where he was a senior, while she was a student at the nearby College of St. Mary’s. Dan’s pursuit of Betty was relentless, bordering on obsession. Today, we would call it “love bombing.” Regardless, they married on April 12, 1969. Betty returned from their honeymoon pregnant with their first child, Kim.

Betty and Dan Broderick at their April 1969 wedding (Morbid Podcast Facebook)
Betty and Dan Broderick at their April 1969 wedding (Morbid Podcast Facebook)

Shortly after their daughter was born, Dan completed his medical degree at Cornell and enrolled in Harvard Law School. He graduated with his J.D. in 1973. Betty was the family’s main support while Dan was a student.

Once he graduated from law school, Dan moved the family to San Diego, California, to work for that city’s largest law firm. Five years later, he left to start his own firm, specializing in medical malpractice.

Betty Broderick is Dumped

The Broderick marriage deteriorated in the early 1980s. In the autumn of 1982, Dan hired Linda Kolkena, a former Delta Air Lines flight attendant, as his legal assistant. Although he initially denied it, Betty began to suspect that Dan and Linda were having an affair. After moving out of their house in February 1985, Dan eventually confessed that he and Linda had, in fact, been intimate. Dan filed for divorce later that year, beginning what became a contentious four-year court battle.

By this time, Dan owned a successful law firm and was president of the San Diego Bar Association. His prominence in the legal community made it difficult for Betty to find anyone to represent her in the divorce action. As the divorce case reached its endgame, Dan received sole custody of his and Betty’s children and sold their house against Betty’s wishes. Betty, naturally, believed he had used his influence in the legal community to achieve these results, as well as to deprive her of a rightful share of his income.

Betty Broderick Snaps

Being replaced by a younger woman broke Betty. While the divorce case dragged on in court, she started to exhibit erratic behavior. She left countless messages using sulphurous language on Dan’s answering machine, ignored restraining orders, and vandalized Dan’s home. Linda was so concerned that she urged Dan to wear a bulletproof vest at their wedding on April 22, 1989. He declined, but did arrange for security guards to patrol the venue. Betty did not attend.

Linda Kolkena and Dan Broderick in an undated photo (Oxygen/YouTube)
Linda Kolkena and Dan Broderick in an undated photo (Oxygen/YouTube)

On November 5, 1989, seven months after Dan and Linda’s wedding, Betty took a gun she had purchased six months earlier and drove to their house. Using a key she had taken from her daughter, Kim, Betty slipped into the house at 5:30 a.m. While the couple slept, she opened fire.

Two bullets struck Linda in the chest and head; she died instantly. One bullet hit Dan in the chest as he appeared to be reaching for the phone. Unknown to him, the phone was not there. Evidence introduced during her trial showed that Betty had removed the combination phone and answering machine to prevent anyone from calling for help.

This five-shot Smith & Wesson .38 caliber revolver was the weapon used to kill Dan and Linda Broderick (Michael Franklin/U-T San Diego/ZUMAPRESS.com)
This five-shot Smith & Wesson .38 caliber revolver was the weapon used to kill Dan and Linda Broderick (Michael Franklin/U-T San Diego/ZUMAPRESS.com)

After calling her daughter, Lee, and Lee’s boyfriend, Betty surrendered herself to the police. She never denied pulling the trigger, but insisted she never planned to kill the couple. Instead, she claimed she only wanted “to talk,” and that Linda screaming, “Call the police!” startled her, causing the gun to go off. However, it is worth noting that the gun “went off” five times, emptying the five-shot Smith & Wesson revolver.

Betty Broderick on Trial

Betty Broderick went on trial on October 22, 1990. Not surprisingly, the prosecution and defense painted two completely opposing versions of what happened on that November morning. Betty’s attorney, Jack Early, claimed that Betty was a battered wife, driven by years of physical, psychological, and mental abuse by her ex-husband. Prosecutor Kerry Wells, however, insisted that Betty was not a battered woman and that she had planned and schemed to kill Dan and Linda.

Betty Broderick in court (Howard Lipin/U-T San Diego/ZUMAPRESS.com)
Betty Broderick in court (Howard Lipin/U-T San Diego/ZUMAPRESS.com)

The trial ended in a hung jury. Two jurors held out for manslaughter, believing Betty had formed no intent to kill Dan and Linda. This forced Judge Thomas J. Whelan to declare a mistrial.

Since the prosecuting and defense attorneys were the same, it was no surprise that Betty’s second trial was mostly a rerun of the first. This time, however, prosecutor Wells secured a conviction on two counts of second-degree murder. Judge Whelan sentenced Betty to two terms of fifteen years to life to be served consecutively. He also sentenced her to two additional years for the illegal use of a firearm.

Epilogue

Betty Broderick has been in custody since the day of the murders and currently (2026) resides at the California Institution for Women in Chino. Denied parole in 2010 and 2017, her next parole hearing will be in January 2032, when she will be 84.

Betty Broderick in an undated prison mugshot (thecinemaholic.com)
Betty Broderick in an undated prison mugshot (thecinemaholic.com)

Numerous books cover the Betty Broderick case. For further reading, consider Forsaking All Others by Loretta Schwartz Nobel, Until the Twelfth of Never by Bella Stumbo, Betty Broderick, the Mother, the Murderer by Charles Dennis, or Bryna Taubman’s Hell Hath No Fury.

Don’t Miss Out! Subscribe to the Newsletter

Subscribe to True Crime in the News, a monthly email newsletter that examines recent news stories of interest to true crime enthusiasts. The newsletter also summarizes the blog posts from the previous month. You won’t want to miss this. Join the newsletter mailing list today.

James Hanratty: Assault, Plus Daring Murder of a Man

Imagine you’re out on a date, parked in a private spot, when someone forces his way into your car and has you drive aimlessly until he finally shoots you. Terrifying, isn’t it? That is what happened to Michael Gregsten and Valerie Storie on an autumn evening in 1961. The crime, dubbed the A6 murder, occurred just off the A6, a major north-south road in England. James Hanratty was convicted and hanged for the crime, but some people doubted his guilt.

The Crime Attributed to James Hanratty

On the evening of August 22, 1961, a Tuesday, Michael Gregsten, a 36-year-old scientist and researcher at the Road Research Laboratory in Slough, went driving with his colleague and girlfriend, Valerie Storie, 22. The pair parked Gregsten’s gray Morris Minor in a quiet lane near Taplow, Buckinghamshire, intending to spend some private time together.

Valerie Storie (thehistorypress.co.uk)
Valerie Storie (thehistorypress.co.uk)

About 9:30 p.m., a man with a revolver approached their car. He ordered Gregsten into the back seat and forced Storie to drive. The gunman, who Storie later described as nervous but commanding, made them drive for hours through London and the surrounding countryside. He frequently changed direction and often demanded they stop for fuel. Gregsten offered the man money to take the car and leave them, but he refused. Their ordeal continued into the early hours of Wednesday morning.

The Murder and Attempted Murder

Shortly after midnight on 23 August 1961, the car pulled into a lay-by (a parking or rest area) on Deadman’s Hill along the A6, near Clophill, Bedfordshire. The man ordered Gregsten and Storie into the back seat. Without warning, he shot Gregsten twice in the head, killing him instantly. He then raped Storie, shot her five times, and left her for dead beside Gregsten’s body. Miraculously, she survived, but the bullets severed her spinal cord and left her permanently paralyzed from the chest down.

A gray Morris Minor Series II (1956) similar to Michael Gregsten's (wikipedia.org)
A gray Morris Minor Series II (1956) similar to Michael Gregsten’s (wikipedia.org)

Around 6:30 a.m., a passing truck driver noticed the oddly parked car and discovered the horrifying scene. Police quickly cordoned off the area, identified Gregsten’s body, and rushed Storie to a hospital in critical condition.

The Investigation and Arrest of James Hanratty

The murder shocked Britain. Bedfordshire Police, assisted by Scotland Yard, launched a manhunt, one of the most extensive of the post-war era. A valuable piece of evidence emerged when someone found the gun used in the crime, a .38 caliber revolver, wrapped in a handkerchief and concealed under the seat of a London bus.

James Hanratty (Alchetron)
James Hanratty (Alchetron)

Storie provided additional crucial information from her hospital bed. She described her attacker as a man in his mid-20s, about 5 ft 7 in tall, with light-brown hair, a Cockney accent, and an intense, restless manner. Her recollections became the cornerstone of the case.

Gradually, detectives focused their attention on James Hanratty, a small-time thief and burglar with a record of petty crimes but no known violence. Hanratty, born in London in 1936, had spent much of his youth in reform schools and prisons. He was known to the police as a habitual but non-violent offender. On 11 October 1961, after weeks on the run and following a public appeal, officers arrested him in Blackpool.

Hanratty vehemently denied any involvement in the murder and rape. He claimed he was in Rhyl, North Wales, at the time, but later changed his story to say he was in Liverpool. The shifting alibis would later undermine his defense.

James Haratty on Trial

Hanratty went on trial on January 22, 1962, at Bedford Assizes. Mr Justice William Gorman presided. It lasted 21 days, one of the longest and most heavily reported trials in British history.

Shire Hall, Bedford, where James Hanratty's trial took place (Paul Harrop via wikimedia.org)
Shire Hall, Bedford, where James Hanratty’s trial took place (Paul Harrop via wikimedia.org)

The prosecution’s case rested primarily on Valerie Storie’s eyewitness identification, ballistic evidence linking the revolver to the crime, and circumstantial connections (such as Hanratty’s known use of the same type of handkerchief found with the weapon).

Michael Sherrard, QC, argued for the defense that Hanratty had been misidentified and that police had mishandled evidence. Several witnesses claimed to have seen him in Rhyl on the day of the murder, though their reliability was questioned.

The jury deliberated for more than nine hours. However, on February 17, 1962, the jurors returned with a guilty verdict. Mr. Justice Gorman sentenced him to death.

James Hanratty Executed

Hanratty’s solicitors submitted appeals for clemency to Home Secretary Rab Butler. Members of the public also flooded the Home Office with clemency petitions. However, the petitions did not sway the Home Secretary; he rejected the appeals.

HM Prison Bedford, where James Hanratty was hanged (Dennis Simpson via wikimedia.org)
HM Prison Bedford, where James Hanratty was hanged (Dennis Simpson via wikimedia.org)

On April 4, 1962, James Hanratty mounted the gallows at Bedford Prison. He maintained his innocence until the end, telling reporters, “I am completely innocent of this crime.” Executioner Henry Allen oversaw the subsequent hanging. Hanratty’s body was buried within the prison grounds, but later exhumed and reburied by his family in 1966.

Many Britons believed the A6 case had been rushed and that Hanratty’s conviction was unsafe. As time passed, numerous journalists, lawyers, and campaigners questioned the evidence against him, arguing that the identification was flawed and the forensic handling inadequate.

Hanratty's father, also named James Hanratty, protests outside the House of Commons on April 21, 1969, long after his son's execution (Keystone/Getty Images via murderpedia.org)
Hanratty’s father, also named James Hanratty, protests outside the House of Commons on April 21, 1969, long after his son’s execution (Keystone/Getty Images via murderpedia.org)

On the other hand, Valerie Storie, who lived as a paraplegic for the rest of her life, continued to insist that police had convicted the right man.

The DNA Breakthrough

In the late 1990s, scientific advances in DNA testing opened the possibility of re-examining some of the evidence in the A6 case. Samples from the gun’s handkerchief and Valerie Storie’s clothing were tested using modern DNA techniques.

In 2001, the Criminal Cases Review Commission referred the case to the Court of Appeal, which heard new forensic evidence. The DNA on both items matched Hanratty’s, and the court upheld his conviction in 2002, ruling the case against him “conclusive.”

Epilogue

Hanratty’s family and their supporters have continued to contest this conclusion and to press for a further review of his conviction.

Valerie Storie never doubted that James Hanratty raped her and killed Gregsten. She was quoted as saying, “I identified the guilty man. I looked in his eyes, and he looked in mine. I knew who he was, and he knew that I recognised him. I had found the guilty person.”

Storie returned to work with the Road Research Laboratory and gave occasional interviews, but mostly avoided publicity. She died on March 26, 2016, in the house in Cippenham where she was born. She was 77 years old.

The A6 murder remains one of the most famous British criminal cases. It occurred at a time when public opinion on capital punishment was shifting, and it often comes up in discussions about the death penalty and the reliability of eyewitness testimony.

You can read more about James Hanratty and the A6 murder case in Hanratty’s Guilt: The A6 Murder and its Aftermath. In this book, author Leonard Miller expands on his earlier Shadows of Deadman’s Hill to argue that Hanratty was guilty of the crimes and that there never should have been any doubt about his conviction.

The Long Silence by Paul Stickler is essentially Valerie Storie’s posthumous autobiography and includes details of the time she and Michael Gregsten spent driving around with the indecisive James Hanratty.

Paul Foote’s Who Killed Hanratty? Argues that negligence and incompetence led to a faulty conviction. However, this book came out before the 2002 ruling based on the new DNA evidence.

Don’t Miss Out! Subscribe to the Newsletter

Subscribe to True Crime in the News, a monthly email newsletter that examines recent news stories of interest to true crime enthusiasts. The newsletter also summarizes the blog posts from the previous month. You won’t want to miss this. Join the newsletter mailing list today.