Betty Broderick: Astonishing Double Homicide

Today’s post is about a double homicide that Betty Broderick committed in 1989.

Consider this scenario. A young woman works to put her husband through first medical school, then law school. Along the way, she gives birth to five children. Then, when he has established himself as a prominent attorney with a lucrative practice, he dumps his wife of sixteen years to marry his much younger legal assistant.

That is precisely the situation Betty Broderick found herself in in the spring of 1989. Tension and stress mounted through the summer and fall, until November, when Betty snapped and shot both her ex-husband and his new wife to death.

This is what happened.

Betty Broderick

Betty Broderick was born Elizabeth Anne Bisceglia in Brooklyn, New York, on November 7, 1947. She and Dan (born Daniel T. Broderick III) met at a dance at Notre Dame University, where he was a senior, while she was a student at the nearby College of St. Mary’s. Dan’s pursuit of Betty was relentless, bordering on obsession. Today, we would call it “love bombing.” Regardless, they married on April 12, 1969. Betty returned from their honeymoon pregnant with their first child, Kim.

Betty and Dan Broderick at their April 1969 wedding (Morbid Podcast Facebook)
Betty and Dan Broderick at their April 1969 wedding (Morbid Podcast Facebook)

Shortly after their daughter was born, Dan completed his medical degree at Cornell and enrolled in Harvard Law School. He graduated with his J.D. in 1973. Betty was the family’s main support while Dan was a student.

Once he graduated from law school, Dan moved the family to San Diego, California, to work for that city’s largest law firm. Five years later, he left to start his own firm, specializing in medical malpractice.

Betty Broderick is Dumped

The Broderick marriage deteriorated in the early 1980s. In the autumn of 1982, Dan hired Linda Kolkena, a former Delta Air Lines flight attendant, as his legal assistant. Although he initially denied it, Betty began to suspect that Dan and Linda were having an affair. After moving out of their house in February 1985, Dan eventually confessed that he and Linda had, in fact, been intimate. Dan filed for divorce later that year, beginning what became a contentious four-year court battle.

By this time, Dan owned a successful law firm and was president of the San Diego Bar Association. His prominence in the legal community made it difficult for Betty to find anyone to represent her in the divorce action. As the divorce case reached its endgame, Dan received sole custody of his and Betty’s children and sold their house against Betty’s wishes. Betty, naturally, believed he had used his influence in the legal community to achieve these results, as well as to deprive her of a rightful share of his income.

Betty Broderick Snaps

Being replaced by a younger woman broke Betty. While the divorce case dragged on in court, she started to exhibit erratic behavior. She left countless messages using sulphurous language on Dan’s answering machine, ignored restraining orders, and vandalized Dan’s home. Linda was so concerned that she urged Dan to wear a bulletproof vest at their wedding on April 22, 1989. He declined, but did arrange for security guards to patrol the venue. Betty did not attend.

Linda Kolkena and Dan Broderick in an undated photo (Oxygen/YouTube)
Linda Kolkena and Dan Broderick in an undated photo (Oxygen/YouTube)

On November 5, 1989, seven months after Dan and Linda’s wedding, Betty took a gun she had purchased six months earlier and drove to their house. Using a key she had taken from her daughter, Kim, Betty slipped into the house at 5:30 a.m. While the couple slept, she opened fire.

Two bullets struck Linda in the chest and head; she died instantly. One bullet hit Dan in the chest as he appeared to be reaching for the phone. Unknown to him, the phone was not there. Evidence introduced during her trial showed that Betty had removed the combination phone and answering machine to prevent anyone from calling for help.

This five-shot Smith & Wesson .38 caliber revolver was the weapon used to kill Dan and Linda Broderick (Michael Franklin/U-T San Diego/ZUMAPRESS.com)
This five-shot Smith & Wesson .38 caliber revolver was the weapon used to kill Dan and Linda Broderick (Michael Franklin/U-T San Diego/ZUMAPRESS.com)

After calling her daughter, Lee, and Lee’s boyfriend, Betty surrendered herself to the police. She never denied pulling the trigger, but insisted she never planned to kill the couple. Instead, she claimed she only wanted “to talk,” and that Linda screaming, “Call the police!” startled her, causing the gun to go off. However, it is worth noting that the gun “went off” five times, emptying the five-shot Smith & Wesson revolver.

Betty Broderick on Trial

Betty Broderick went on trial on October 22, 1990. Not surprisingly, the prosecution and defense painted two completely opposing versions of what happened on that November morning. Betty’s attorney, Jack Early, claimed that Betty was a battered wife, driven by years of physical, psychological, and mental abuse by her ex-husband. Prosecutor Kerry Wells, however, insisted that Betty was not a battered woman and that she had planned and schemed to kill Dan and Linda.

Betty Broderick in court (Howard Lipin/U-T San Diego/ZUMAPRESS.com)
Betty Broderick in court (Howard Lipin/U-T San Diego/ZUMAPRESS.com)

The trial ended in a hung jury. Two jurors held out for manslaughter, believing Betty had formed no intent to kill Dan and Linda. This forced Judge Thomas J. Whelan to declare a mistrial.

Since the prosecuting and defense attorneys were the same, it was no surprise that Betty’s second trial was mostly a rerun of the first. This time, however, prosecutor Wells secured a conviction on two counts of second-degree murder. Judge Whelan sentenced Betty to two terms of fifteen years to life to be served consecutively. He also sentenced her to two additional years for the illegal use of a firearm.

Epilogue

Betty Broderick has been in custody since the day of the murders and currently (2026) resides at the California Institution for Women in Chino. Denied parole in 2010 and 2017, her next parole hearing will be in January 2032, when she will be 84.

Betty Broderick in an undated prison mugshot (thecinemaholic.com)
Betty Broderick in an undated prison mugshot (thecinemaholic.com)

Numerous books cover the Betty Broderick case. For further reading, consider Forsaking All Others by Loretta Schwartz Nobel, Until the Twelfth of Never by Bella Stumbo, Betty Broderick, the Mother, the Murderer by Charles Dennis, or Bryna Taubman’s Hell Hath No Fury.

Don’t Miss Out! Subscribe to the Newsletter

Subscribe to True Crime in the News, a monthly email newsletter that examines recent news stories of interest to true crime enthusiasts. The newsletter also summarizes the blog posts from the previous month. You won’t want to miss this. Join the newsletter mailing list today.

History Day; Crammed, Frantic Schedule; No Time for Blog

If you follow me regularly, you will have noticed that I have not published a crime-related blog post for the past two Sundays. The primary reason is that I was involved in judging Chicago Metro History Day and Northern Illinois History Day. So, what is History Day? I thought you’d never ask.

History Day Contests

History Day is a contest for middle and high school students that encourages them to learn the techniques of professional historians. Students from all over the country and other nations participate. Grades 6, 7, and 8 compete in the Junior Division, while high school students are in the Senior Division.

Students have several options for the type of project they create. They can write a historical paper, create a website, construct a display board, produce a documentary video, or act in a performance. Regardless of the type of project, each must demonstrate historical research and make a “so what?” argument.

The logo for National History Day. The NHD organization oversees all History Day contests.
The logo for National History Day. The NHD organization oversees all History Day contests.

National History Day, the parent organization overseeing the contests chooses a theme each year that students must incorporate into their projects. Participants first compete within their school and the best projects in each category advance to a regional contest. From the regional competitions, entries advance to the state affiliates. The best projects at the state contests advance to the national competition held each year on the University of Maryland campus in College Park, Maryland.

This is my eleventh year judging History Day contests. While the quality of the projects may vary, the enthusiasm of the student historians does not. So, pardon me for taking a couple of weeks off from crime blogging to contribute to this worthwhile endeavor. True crime will be back next week.

Don’t Miss Out! Subscribe to the Newsletter

Subscribe to True Crime in the News, a monthly email newsletter that looks at recent news stories that will interest any true crime fan. There is also a summary of the previous month’s blog posts. You won’t want to miss this. Join the newsletter mailing list today.

Helle Crafts: Beautiful Victim of a Strange Murder

Last week, we saw how Charles Stuart shot and killed his wife and invented a carjacking to cover his tracks. This week’s case, also in the northeast, involves an unusual attempt to hide a murder. In 1986, her airline pilot husband killed flight attendant Helle Crafts. He then took some truly bizarre stops to hide his crime. It was also the first Connecticut case where the state obtained a murder conviction without a body.

Helle Crafts

Helle Crafts was born Helle Lorck Nielsen in Charlottenlund Denmark in 1947. She married Richard Crafts, a pilot for Eastern Airlines in 1979. They lived in Newtown, Connecticut. Richard continued to fly for Eastern and Helle was a flight attendant for Pan Am.

Danish flight attendant Helle Crafts
Danish flight attendant Helle Crafts

By 1986, the couple had three children and a troubled marriage. Learning that Richard had had several affairs, Helle consulted a divorce attorney. She also hired private investigator Keith Mayo to get evidence of Richard’s infidelity.

Helle and Richard Crafts in happier times
Helle and Richard Crafts in happier times

Helle Crafts Disappears

On November 16, 1986, Helle worked a long flight from Frankfurt, West Germany (East and West Germany did not reunify until 1990). Friends dropped her off at the home she shared with Richard in Connecticut. They never saw her again.

Helle Crafts
Helle Crafts

Richard Crafts gave different versions of where his wife was. He told her friends she was in Denmark visiting her mother. At other times he said she was traveling in the Canary Islands with a friend. Then there were the times he said he simply didn’t know where she was. Helle’s friends weren’t buying it. They knew Richard had a volatile temper. And Helle told some of them, “If something happens to me, don’t think it was an accident.”

Richard and Helle Crafts with their three children (Forensic Files)

Where is Helle Crafts?

Private investigator Keith Mayo became convinced that Richard Crafts had something to do with Helle’s disappearance. But Crafts had been a volunteer constable in Newtown and was also a part-time officer in neighboring Sudbury. Therefore, the police were reluctant to investigate him for murder. Local authorities turned the case over to the Connecticut State Police on December 26.

Police escort Richard Crafts to a bond hearing in Danbury, Connecticut on January 20, 1987. The court refused to lower his $750,000 bond (AP Photo)
Police escort Richard Crafts to a bond hearing in Danbury, Connecticut on January 20, 1987. The court refused to lower his $750,000 bond (AP Photo)

While Richard vacationed with his children in Florida, troopers searched his Newtown home. They found blood stains on the side of a mattress and missing sections of carpet. Credit card records showed that about the time Helle went missing, Crafts had purchased bed sheets and a comforter. He had also bought a chainsaw and rented a woodchipper. Police later found the chainsaw in nearby Lake Zoar. On the saw, investigators found hair and blood that matched Helle’s DNA. Though someone had filed off the serial number, investigators were able to recover enough of it to be readable. It was the same saw Crafts purchased.

After police searched the Crafts home, a snowplow driver reported something he had seen on the night of November 18. He said he’d seen a rental truck with a woodchipper attached parked near Lake Zoar. He led detectives to the site. There they found human tissue, two teeth, a tooth crown, a fingernail covered in pink nail polish, and a toenail. They also found 2,660 bleached blonde human hairs.

Prosecuting Richard Crafts

To present a case for homicide, there must be proof of death. Normally, identification of the dead body serves this purpose. But in this case, there was no body. However, a forensic dentist was able to match the tooth crown found near Lake Zoar to Helle Crafts’ dental records. With that evidence, the Connecticut State Medical Examiner’s office issued a death certificate and Richard Crafts went to trial.

Richard Crafts addresses the jury at his murder trial
Richard Crafts addresses the jury at his murder trial

The trial began in May 1988 in New London. The defense won a change of venue because of extensive pretrial publicity. That trial ended in July with a hung jury. A solitary juror held out for acquittal before walking out of deliberations and refusing to return. A second trial in Norwalk ended in a guilty verdict on November 21, 1989. It was almost exactly three years since Helle’s murder.

Richard Crafts received a sentence of 50 years in prison on January 8, 1990. He was released after serving only 32 years. This was because the law—since changed—gave prisoners credit for good behavior and having a prison job. He was released to the custody of a Bridgeport, Connecticut transitional house for homeless veterans.

Richard in later years
Richard Crafts in later years

What Happened to Helle Crafts?

The Crafts apparently fought after Helle arrived home from Frankfurt. Evidence suggests Richard killed Helle by striking her with a blunt object at least twice. He then placed her body in the large freezer he bought. Later, he removed the frozen body, then used the chainsaw to cut it in to manageable pieces. Afterwards, he used the woodchipper to destroy the body. However, the snowplow driver directed police to the site where he used the chipper. Forensic science did the rest.

In prison, Richard Crafts’ fellow convicts called him “Mister Chips.”

The Cohen brothers move, Fargo, includes a scene where a woodchipper is used to get rid of a body.

You can read more about this case in The Woodchipper Murder by Arthur Herzog. Also, the inaugural episode of Forensic Files featured the Helle Crafts case.

Subscribe to the Newsletter

The Old Crime is New Again newsletter is a monthly email covering a topic that has not appeared in the blog. Don’t miss out! Sign up for the newsletter today.

John Jourbet: The Truth About a Loathsome Serial Killer

After last week’s Olympic Park bombing case, this week we look at Nebraska serial killer John Jourbet. Over fifteen months in 1982-1983, Jourbet killed a young boy in Portland, Maine and two in the Omaha, Nebraska area..

John Jourbet

John Jourbet clearly had a troubled childhood. He entered the world in Lawrence, Massachusetts on July 2, 1963. His parents divorced soon after his birth, and his mother did not allow Jourbet to see his father. In 1971, Jourbet and his mother moved out of the family home into a run-down apartment. Jourbet’s mother was very controlling, and by this time, he had begun to hate her as a result.

John Jourbet mugshot after his 1984 arrest.
John Jourbet mugshot after his 1984 arrest.

His schoolmates considered young John something of an outcast. He joined the Cub Scouts trying to find a way to “belong.” But it was also at this time when he began to have disturbing fantasies about murdering strangers on the street.

When Jourbet was 13, he stabbed a girl with a pencil and felt stimulated when she cried in pain. The next day, he sliced another girl with a razor blade as he biked past. In yet another incident, he beat and nearly strangled a boy. Unfortunately, he was never caught for any of these attacks.

John Jourbet Begins Killing

It was Sunday, August 22, 1982. Richard “Ricky” Stetson, 11, went jogging on the 3.5-mile Black Cove Trail near Portland, Maine. His parents notified police when Ricky had not returned home by dark. The next day, a motorist on I-295 discovered the boy’s body. Police arrested a suspect, but the forensic evidence did not match him. However, the suspected stayed in jail for nearly a year and a half before authorities released him.

Ricky Stetson, the first boy Jourbet killed
Ricky Stetson, the first boy Jourbet killed

Over a year later, on Sunday, September 18, 1983, 13-year-old Danny Joe Eberle went missing while on his newspaper route. Danny lived in the Omaha suburb of Bellevue, Nebraska and had a route for the Omaha World-Herald. He had only delivered 3 of the 70 papers on his route.

Danny Eberle
Danny Eberle

Danny’s brother also had a route for the World-Herald. He hadn’t seen Danny that Sunday but did remember a white man in a tan car following him on previous days.

Danny’s bicycle and undelivered papers turned up at the address of his fourth customer, but there was no sign of Danny. Sadly, his body was found three days later, about 4 miles from where he left his bicycle. His hands and feet were tied, and surgical tape covered his mouth. The rope used to tie Danny was quite unusual and didn’t match samples in the FBI’s database.

Another young boy disappeared from nearby Papillion, Nebraska three months later, on December 2. Christopher Walden was 12 years old. His body was found two days later, stabbed and nearly decapitated. Although there were similarities to Danny Eberle’s murder, there were differences as well.

Christopher Walden, the last Jourbet murder victim
Christopher Walden, the last Jourbet murder victim

Arrest and Trial

January 11, 1984 was a Wednesday. A preschool teacher noticed a young man driving around in the area of the murders. She thought he looked suspicious, so she wrote down is license number. When the driver saw her doing this, he stopped and threatened her before driving off. The car wasn’t tan, but it turned out to be a rental. The renter was John Jourbet, a radar technician from Offutt Air Force Base, which is in the Omaha area. His own car, a tan Chevrolet Nova, was in the shop.

When police and FBI agents searched Jourbet’s room, they discovered rope matching the rope used to bind Danny Eberle. It has been specially made for the U.S. military in South Korea.

Pioneering FBI profiler Robert K. Ressler worked up a profile for the case. The profile matched Jourbet in every respect. Ressler presented the case to a class at the FBI academy in Quantico, Virginia. There a policeman from Maine noted similarities to the case of the Stetson boy. Jourbet had been living with his mother in Portland at the time of that murder. Ressler and Maine authorities hypothesized that Jourbet joined the military to get away from the Stetson killing.

John Jourbet prison photo taken shortly before his execution in 1996
John Jourbet prison photo taken shortly before his execution in 1996

Jourbet confessed to the Nebraska murders on January 12, 1984. Charged with the murders, he initially pled not guilty but changed his plea to guilty. A three-judge panel sentenced him to death. He also received a life sentence in Maine for the Ricky Stetson murder (Maine doesn’t have the death penalty).

Epilogue

After exhausting his appeals, John Jourbet died in the Nebraska electric chair on July 17, 1996.

A book on the case by Mark Pettit and Marcelo Galvao, A Need to Kill, appeared in 2013.

Subscribe to the Newsletter

The Old Crime is New Again newsletter is a monthly email covering a topic that has not appeared in the blog. Don’t miss out! Sign up for the newsletter today.