Our previous case was that of Amy Archer-Gilligan, the Connecticut nursing home owner who murdered her residents for money. This week, we look at the tragic death of Joann Katrinak and her infant son, Alex.
Joanne Katrinak
Joann Katrinak was just 23 and had recently escaped a troubled marriage when she met Andy Katrinak in the spring of 1992. The two soon became “an item,” and within two years were married with a small son they named Alex. The couple lived in Catasauqua, Pennsylvania, a small town north of Allentown.
On December 15, 1994, Joann called her mother-in-law and said she’d be coming over and bringing baby Alex. She never arrived. Nor was she at home when Andy Katrinak returned from work. Andy found that someone had wrenched their basement’s exterior door open and cut the phone line. (In 1994, cell phones weren’t ubiquitous; most homes still had landlines.)
When Joann’s car turned up in a parking lot close to the Katrinak home, police treated it as a crime scene. They found several blonde hairs (Joann was a brunette), some of which, upon closer examination, had blood on them.
Joann Katrinak Found Dead
Four months passed before a farmer plowing his fields came across a discarded bundle of clothing. Upon closer examination, he determined it was not simply clothing but a badly decomposed human body. Rather, two bodies, for on top of the dead woman’s abdomen was the body of an infant. Joann and Alex were missing no longer.
Andy Katrinak remembered that three days before she disappeared, Joann had answered a call from one of his ex-girlfriends, Patricia Rorrer. The two argued, and Joann slammed the phone down (landline, remember?). Rorrer had also once managed a riding stable near where the bodies were found. It began to look like it would be worth questioning Patricia Rorrer.
Patricia denied any involvement in the murders and offered several alibis, at least one of which was demonstrably false. Several clues pointed to her as the kidnapper and killer, but the clincher was the blonde hairs found in Joann’s car and on her body. Although Rorrer, like Joann, a brunette, at the time Joann and Alex disappeared, it was bleached blonde. Mitochondrial DNA proved that the hairs were Rorrer’s.
In March 1998, a jury returned two guilty verdicts for murder and two for kidnapping. She was sentenced to two life terms.
Epilogue
Patricia Rorrer maintains her innocence and has made several appeals, all of which have failed. The Innocence Project has declined to take her case.
Despite the evidence against her, Rorrer has her advocates. One of them, Tammy Mal, published a book on the case, Convenient Suspect, that promotes the theory Rorrer was wrongly convicted.
Today (2023), Rorrer resides at the State Correctional Institution – Muncy in Lycoming County, Pennsylvania.
Don’t Miss Out! Subscribe to the Newsletter
Subscribe to True Crime in the News, a monthly email newsletter that looks at recent news stories that will interest any true crime fan. There is also a summary of the previous month’s blog posts. You won’t want to miss this. Sign up for the newsletter today.
Reference this article, compared to most articles/videos/podcasts relating to this case, I note your account is fair and free from speculation and misinformation.
However, there is another side to this long-running saga which should be made known to the public, especially those who doggedly stick to the fact that if the jury found her guilty, then it must be fact.
As you point out a book has been published which makes a very compelling case for Rorrer’s innocence, and more recently, a group of former judges, known as “Judges for Justice” who’ve taken her case on board and have revealed a great deal of evidence in her support.
So, while you’re at pains to point out “The Innocence Project” declined to take up her case, perhaps now you can make it known she now has the support of the aforementioned judges.
They have posted six videos (so far – with another two to follow in due course) on Youtube, making assertions of evidence switching, as well as the Prosecution failing to inform Rorrer’s Defence team of various items of evidence which would have been favourable to her case… and failing to reveal witnesses in support of Rorrer (amounting to several Brady violations) all of which point to a wrongful conviction.
I wrote that blog post a little over two years ago. Perhaps revisiting the case would be in order.